Sunday, August 31, 2008

And if Obama Loses?

By Nicholas Stix

“And If Obama Loses?” is the title of Pat Buchanan’s new column.

I will answer Buchanan’s question. If the politician of *undetermined identity running under the name “Barack Obama” loses, blacks will riot. And if “Obama” wins, blacks will … riot.

They will riot, because that’s what they do. They riot when they’re angry; they riot when they’re happy; they riot, knowing that rioting will make them happy, if only for fleeting moments; they riot, because they have no self-control, and it just comes over them. A substantial percentage of young blacks will participate in at least one riot in their life, and some will participate in dozens. Most “law-abiding” blacks will cheer them on, and not a few will commit obstruction of justice, in order to save black rioters from having to pay for their mayhem. As if they were in any danger of being called to account.

The vast majority of blacks, perhaps as much as 90 percent, believe that they are under no obligation to obey what they call “the white man’s law,” and teach this to their own and other blacks’ children, as they were taught it by Martin Luther King Jr., Elijah Muhammad, et al. But few will admit this publicly. Then, when the children of whatever age do as they were taught, the same blacks conjure up racial fairy tales like the notion that the prisons are full of innocent black men who were targeted by racist white policemen through a policy of “racial profiling.”

What I’d like to know is, do the white socialists, communists, and soccer moms who will vote for “Obama” think that if they fall into the clutches of racist black sociopaths, politely informing the folks that they voted for “Obama” will cause their captors to refrain from raping (the women and the men), maiming, torturing and murdering them? Or do they delude themselves that they are safe from such predators?

And as among whites, a vote for “Obama” will only materially benefit a tiny, well-connected, elite, I have to ask the vast majority of His white supporters this: Is the feeling of moral superiority that comes from voting for “Obama” worth possibly bringing about everything from the economic ruin to the physical annihilation of millions of whites, including yourselves?



* Since unbeknownst to his teenaged mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, The One’s bigamous father was already married to a Kenyan woman, his parents’ marriage was invalid. Thus, his properly legal surname at birth would have been Dunham. And according to the Associated Press, when The One was five or six years old, after his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, adopted him, Soetoro filed a birth certificate in Indonesia with the legal name, “Barry Soetoro.”

9 comments:

DK said...

Is the feeling of moral superiority that comes from voting for “Obama” worth possibly bringing about everything from the economic ruin to the physical annihilation of millions of whites, including yourselves?

Could you be more hysterical? Calm down, Nick.

This is not about race for most white people voting for Obama. You are superimposing your own AMREN lens on people.

Anonymous said...

“Could you be more hysterical? Calm down, Nick.”

Pot, kettle, David. I just checked out your blog, http://kvetcher.net/

Stix:

“This is not about race for most white people voting for Obama. You are superimposing your own AMREN lens on people.”

I don’t know what an “AMREN lens” is, and as brilliant as AmRen is, I certainly don’t need to borrow anyone else’s lens to impose on reality. Can you say the same?

I was intimately acquainted with black supremacy before my 15th birthday. What is your acquaintance with it? How many times have blacks sought to murder you based solely on the color of your skin?

And now, how does the “lens” in my discussion of upper-class self-righteousness and class war fundamentally differ from the “lens” of your discussion of upper-class self-righteousness and class war?

http://kvetcher.net/2008/06/22/city-shocked-that-children-from-south-bronx-fail-to-qualify-for-gifted-programs-like-children-from-upper-west-side/

David Kelsey:

“Which community’s kids do you think are going to be passed over for the gifted programs for the sake of racial diversity? And don’t kid yourselves…important rich Jews who send their own kids to private schools will be all too willing to rig the schools against middle class Jews in order to prove how progressive they are, and even the majority who won’t support such measures will refrain from fighting them in any significant way.”

Because I spoke of “economic ruin” and “physical annihilation”? Well, that is what Dunham/Soetoro/Obama/Whoever seeks. And if you don’t grasp that, you’re guilty either of intellectual laziness or self-delusion.

What does the combination of genocidal black supremacy (Black Liberation Theology) and communism give you?

And answer me this: What motivation, besides race, could explain whites voting for Obama? Hell, people of any race? And don’t say he’ll help the white working class, because that’s the furthest thing from his mind. In order to further confuse the white electorate, Paul Begala misrepresented "Obama’s" promise as being to help the “middle class,“ but The One said no such thing. He said “working families.” If you don’t know what that phrase refers to, check out the “Working Families Party.”

Who do you think is slated to pay for The One’s racial reparations program, which will include millions of immigrants who haven‘t even arrived yet?

And yet, even with the MSM running interference for D/S/O/W, any white working-class adult can see right through him.

If you honestly don’t know of this man’s plans to dispossess white Americans, then you have a lot of studying ahead of you.

Anonymous said...

Don't worry, there's no way in hell Obama can lose. He'll win, but it won't be the end of the world; it might not be good, but it won't be catastrophic.

DK said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
DK said...

What motivation, besides race, could explain whites voting for Obama?

Let's see there, Nicholas. Wouldn't the fact that the great majority of whites who would have voted for Hillary if she were the candidate strongly suggest that their preference is in fact, NOT about race?

Do you really need me to show you other issues motivating people besides race in this election? Do you really need me to offer you the litany of complaints against the current situation that people are unhappy with? Has it occurred to you that many whites are voting for Obama DESPITE their issues with his black nationalism, and are banking that the conservatives -- who are awfully docile when there is a free-spending, affirmative action affirming Republican president in the white house--will do their job for a change, and resist that sort of thing?

Anonymous said...

What frightens me is what black folks will do if Obama gets killed. According to Muslim law, Obama is a Muslim apostate. His father was Muslim, therefore he is Muslim. Since he has converted, he is an apostate Muslim. Apostate Muslims must pay with their lives according to Muslim law. Obama currently lives under an implicit Muslim death sentence.

If he is murdered, white America will pay through murder, pillage, riot, and rapine. Through mandatory Holocaust and Slavery education in grade schools, high schools and the deluge in popular culture, non-whites have been thoroughly educated into the racial, religious and ethnic guilt of white people (gentiles, that is).

It makes no difference who does the killing.

If it is an Arab like RFK's killer or not, all white people will pay.

I expect la raza will join with them in an effort to share the spoils.

I do not look forward to Obama being president. The risk for my race and tribe is too great.

Anonymous said...

You are going a little far on the "blacks rioting" thing, I think! Your site has too many white supremacist overtones, although I think you are just the rightist version of B.BarNavi (leftist).

Nicholas said...

Are you aware, Justin, that eight weeks after I predicted rioting either way, the MSM are now saying the same thing? Are you attacking them for having "too many white supremacist overtones"?

“Police prepare for unrest”
http://thehill.com/index2.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=77165&pop=1&page=0&Itemid=70

Nicholas Stix

Nicholas said...

Oops. Most of that URL got chopped off. Let's try it again.

“Police prepare for unrest”
http://thehill.com/index2.php?option=com_content&task=
view&id=77165&pop=1&page=
0&Itemid=70